Thursday, January 22 2026 13:03
Naira Badalian

Armenia to restrict involvement of companies affiliated with  high-ranking officials and their family members in procurement  processes

Armenia to restrict involvement of companies affiliated with  high-ranking officials and their family members in procurement  processes

ArmInfo.  Starting in January 2027, Armenia will legislatively restrict the participation of  companies affiliated with high-ranking government officials and their  family members in procurement processes. On January 22, the Armenian  government approved the draft law "On Amendments and Supplements to  the Law on Public Procurement and Related Laws."

As stated by Finance Minister Vahe Hovhannisyan, establishing systems  that eliminate corruption in procurement is among the priorities of  the Armenian Cabinet. The creation of such a system is outlined both  in the RA Anti-Corruption Strategy and in reports submitted by  international partners.

According to the law, affiliated entities will include the official's  spouse, children, parents, siblings, and anyone living with them. The  restrictions will also apply to companies in which the official or  their relatives (collectively) directly (through ownership of  shares/stocks, contributions, or use of funds for business purposes)  or indirectly (through voting rights, influencing decisions, or  controlling stakes, as regulated by legislation on major transactions  and related-party transactions) have the right to manage authorized  capital, make decisions, and issue binding instructions.

Within the framework of the above, this draft was developed, which  proposes: - Defining the concepts of "conflict of interest" and  "affiliated participant."

- Reserving the government the right to determine instances of  increased influence of individuals holding government positions or  who are civil servants on procurement processes, based on their  actual or potential influence on these processes.

- Reserving the government the right to include the heads of  executive bodies of state funds in the 2nd and 3rd levels of  influence and/or to increase these levels.

The draft provides for three levels of influence.

- Organizations with a conflict of interest with officials included  in the first level may not participate in procurement processes. This  level must include the President of the Republic, the Speaker of the  National Assembly, the Prime Minister, the Deputy Prime Ministers,  the Minister of Finance, and the Deputy Prime Minister coordinating  the development of procurement policy.

- Organizations with a conflict of interest with officials included  in the second level may not participate in procurement processes  organized by the given contracting authority, as well as commercial  and non-profit organizations under its jurisdiction. This level  necessarily includes individuals holding administrative and political  positions (except for members of the National Assembly and members of  the Community Council), the Prosecutor General and his deputies,  heads of investigative bodies and their deputies, and secretaries  general.

- Organizations with a conflict of interest with officials included  in the third level may not participate in procurement processes  organized by the given contracting authority. This level of influence  necessarily includes members of independent government bodies and  autonomous bodies, including the Governor of the Central Bank and his  deputies, and the Human Rights Defender.

- Restrict the participation of companies associated with the  aforementioned individuals in procurement processes by stipulating  that participants must submit a statement along with their bid  declaring their lack of connection with these officials.

It is also planned to establish in the concluded contract (draft)  that in all cases where the Corruption Prevention Commission's  conclusion establishes that a party to the contract has violated the  prohibition on participating in the procurement process prior to the  conclusion of the contract, the customer may unilaterally terminate  the contract based on this conclusion. Furthermore, if, on the date  of the decision to unilaterally terminate the contract, there are  duly executed contract deliverables that have not yet been accepted  by the customer, the customer is obligated to ensure their acceptance  and payment.

It is noted that the customer bears no risk of actual losses or lost  profits for the party to the contract as a result of unilateral  termination of the contract, and the party to the contract will  return 20% of the amount paid by it under the transaction to the  client. This amount will be offset against the contract amount and/or  qualification security provided in the form of a bank guarantee or  cash. If the amount: a. is less than the security amount, the  remaining security amount is returned to the party to the contract;  b. is greater than the security amount, the party to the contract  guarantees payment of the remaining amount to the client. It is  stipulated that unilateral termination of a contract based on a  violation of the prohibition will not result in the company being  blacklisted.

To implement the proposed model, the package also includes amendments  and additions to the Codes of the Commission for the Prevention of  Corruption (which will oversee the implementation of the  restrictions) and the Code of Administrative Procedure Law.