Monday, February 10 2020 12:55
David Stepanyan

Economist: Statistical data on the Armenian economy contain  inexplicable contradictions

Economist: Statistical data on the Armenian economy contain  inexplicable contradictions

ArmInfo.The latest official statistics on the Armenian economy contain certain and inexplicable contradictions. Former Chairman of the Central Bank of Armenia,  economist Bagrat Asatryan expressed such an opinion to ArmInfo.

"In particular, as recorded by statistics, the long-term decline in  the agricultural sector does not correlate with the volume of  processing of agricultural products or the characteristics of its  consumption. The second example is a 50% drop in freight traffic in  Armenia in 2019. This indicator is generally unclear in the context  of economic growth," he noted.

According to expert estimates, positive shifts in a number of sectors  of the economy simply could not take place in the conditions of  similar trends in the field of domestic cargo transportation. And the  same drop of 60% of road freight transportation within the republic,  in his opinion, is directly opposite to statistical data.  In this  light, Asatryan sees the need for the intervention of the prosecution  authorities in order to identify the causes of these contradictions.

According to the preliminary data of the Armenian Statistical  Committee for 2019, the Armenian economy completed last year with an  economic activity growth rate of 7.8%. In particular, the volume of  services grew by 11%, foreign trade turnover - by 10.4%, industrial  products - by 9%. At the same time, the volume of agricultural gross  output fell by 4.2%, and electricity production decreased by 1.9%. It  is possible that the final results will differ from those presented.

In general, Asatryan is convinced that, even demonstrating a very  impressive growth in activity in 2019, the Armenian economy has big  holes, unresolved problems and is deprived of balanced development.   Assessing economic activity at 7.8% as an unambiguously good  indicator, moreover, both in the ratio of the planned indicator and  in relation to the results of 2018, the economist sees problems and  contradictions in its structure and quality.

According to him, the prevalence of economic activity in the services  and trade, in general, is not bad. at first glance, the second place  occupied by industry, is also not bad. However, Asatryan points out  that when considering the structure of growth rates, it is noticeable  that already in the second half of 2019, the mining industry became  the locomotive and leader of this activity. Given the absence of  growth in employment or production volumes, the expert estimates this  indicator as a consequence of the elementary acceleration of the  theft of mineral resources.

The economist is also concerned about the prevailing prevalence of  growth in import volumes over export volumes. According to his  estimates, the decline in the agricultural sector contributes to  this, with all its attendant consequences. The decline in electricity  consumption, according to his estimates, looks rather strange, given  the lack of visible achievements in the field of energy conservation.  Moreover, the latter circumstance, in turn, gives cause for concern.