Friday, June 11 2021 12:35
Naira Badalian

Head of the Audit Chamber of Armenia presented facts of abuses in the  field of road construction

Head of the Audit Chamber of Armenia presented facts of abuses in the  field of road construction

ArmInfo.The classification of highways and their assignment to categories, approved by the Armenian government, does not meet the legislative requirements "On highways  of the RA", the head of the Audit Chamber Levon Yolyan said in the  parliament, presenting an annual report on activities, presenting  abuses in the field of road construction.  

As a result, according to  him, 554 kilometers of Armenian roads do not meet the established  regulatory requirements, in connection with which the costs of their  maintenance exceeded the foreseen cost by 546 million drams. 569 km  of roads, for the maintenance of which 2 billion 041 million drams  were spent, are roads of regional importance, therefore, they should  have been run by the heads of regions. 93 roads, for the maintenance  of which 148 million drams were allocated, are inter-field and,  according to the legislation, do not require maintenance costs.

In 10 objects, funds were provided for the same work both in  maintenance contracts and in the implementation of repair work. As a  result, a double order was made to the same contractor, for which AMD  185 million more was paid. In addition, during the warranty period of  road maintenance, a corresponding assessment was not carried out,  which is why the costs exceeded 78 million drams.  No attention was  paid to the technical control over the quality of the roads being  repaired. Asphalt concrete mixture worth 701 million drams on the  interstate road Yerevan-Sevan-Ijevan border of Azerbaijan does not  meet the current standards.

In 6 contracts, the customer did not unilaterally terminate the  contract - the customer did not demand compensation and did not add  it to the "black list". At the same time, the customer suspended the  contract, thus exempting the contractor from paying a forfeit (fine,  fines) in the amount of AMD 134 million.  Moreover, the cost of the  contract, in full, was paid to the contractor as an advance, despite  the fact that this was not provided for in the contract.