Wednesday, July 1 2026 17:20

Toxic surplus of  Russian ruble transforms this currency into heavy  and dangerous burden for banks within EAEU: the reaction is either  tightening conditions or outright refusal

Toxic surplus of  Russian ruble transforms this currency into heavy  and dangerous burden for banks within EAEU: the reaction is either  tightening conditions or outright refusal

ArmInfo.The toxic surplus of the Russian  ruble has transformed this currency into a heavy and dangerous burden  for banks within EAEU: the reaction is either tightening conditions  or outright refusal to process those funds. This surplus is deemed  toxic because the funds are effectively "locked" within these banking  systems, offering no return on investment while simultaneously  exposing financial institutions to secondary sanction risks.

Due to international sanctions, local banks in countries like  Kazakhstan and Armenia face severe difficulties in converting these  physical cash holdings into digital form for correspondent accounts  in Russia, or exchanging them for dollars and euros on the global  market. Furthermore, banks incur ongoing operational losses  associated with the secure storage, armed transit, cash-in-transit  (CIT) services, and the rigorous authentication required for these  banknotes—all while the capital remains idle.  RBC, citing its own  sources and official data, describes the situation with the Russian  ruble in the EAEU countries as follows: Since June, the banking  systems of the Eurasian Economic Union member states have begun a  sharp tightening of their policies regarding the Russian currency. 

"Banks in EAEU countries have begun to restrict or tighten the  conditions for depositing cash rubles into bank accounts. Some  Armenian banks have adopted the strictest approach, completely  ceasing operations with cash rubles, including deposits into bank  accounts. However, non-cash payments continue to be processed under  stanadard conditions. Banks in Belarus (at least eight major ones –  Alfa-Bank, Belarusbank, BelVEB, BNB-Bank, MTBank, Sberbank,  Technobank, and Zepter Bank) and Kazakhstan (one of the largest  players – CenterCredit – BCC) have introduced restrictions. These  institutions have imposed commissions ranging from 2% to 5% for  depositing physical rubles via teller counters, terminals, and ATMs.  In Kyrgyzstan, EcoIslamicBank has set a similar rate for transfers  made through the SWIFT system," RBC reports.

According to experts, the core of the problem lies in a huge surplus  of Russian currency circulating within EAEU member states. According  to the National Bank of Kazakhstan, the country's exchange offices  purchased 6.5 billion rubles in April alone, and another 4.7 billion  rubles in May. Experts also clarify that accepting and processing  cash entails significant costs for banks for storage, collection  (transportation), and authentication. At the same time, amid Western  sanctions, demand for cash rubles abroad is virtually nonexistent,  making such operations directly unprofitable for local banks. They  believe the increase in cash flows was influenced by the overall  growth in the volume of cash circulating within the Russian  Federation, which has increased by approximately 1.4 trillion rubles  since the beginning of the year. They added that the outflow of cash  to neighboring countries has increased due to tightened internal  controls in Russia:  Russian banks consider deposits of more than 5  million rubles by individuals (and more than 30 million rubles by  legal entities) in cash within 30 days and subsequent rapid transfers  abroad suspicious, leading to account freezing. Furthermore, the  situation is affected by the decree of the Russian president,  effective April 1, prohibiting the export of cash exceeding $100,000  to EAEU countries, forcing entities to export funds in ruble  equivalents. 

Meanwhile, according to information collected by ArmInfo Investment  Company, Armenian banks continue to set exchange rates for cash and  non-cash transactions on their websites. As of July 1 of this year,  for example, at 1:00 PM, the AMD/RUB exchange rate fluctuated between  3.7/4.7 and 4.45/4.85 drams per 1 RUB for cash transactions, and  between 4.05/4.79 and 4.47/4.94  per 1 RUB for non-cash transactions.  On July 1 of this year, at 1:00 PM, the AMD/RUB exchange rate on the  Armenian retail FX market fluctuated between 4.40/4.65 and 4.45/4.70  per 1 RUB.

It should be noted that in the second half of June, the spread  between the buying and selling rates of the Russian ruble on the  Armenian retail foreign exchange market increased sharply, from  0.10-0.12 points to 0.45 points. However, by the end of June, the  spread had narrowed to 0.25 points, decreasing slightly further to  0.20 points in early July.

ArmInfo has also learned that in Armenia, there are currently only  isolated cases of banks refusing to accept ruble deposits, citing a  lack of demand. Experts are hesitant to predict whether a chain  reaction (a refusal of ruble deposits) will follow, given the  aforementioned situation with the Russian currency, though they don't  rule it out either. Regarding the discontinuation of cash ruble  operations, including deposits into bank accounts, industry analysts  view the actions taken by these banks as entirely justified. Experts  emphasize that the fundamental principles of banking remain  unchanged: "Risk management and the regulation of currency positions  remain absolute imperatives."