ArmInfo. MP from the Prosperous Armenia faction Mikael Melkumyan considers the proposal of the leader of the party Gagik Tsarukyan to "nullify" citizens' loans in the amount of up to AMD 3 million as appropriate and topical. "The proposal passed an expert discussion at the highest level, and the comment of the head of the Central Bank, perhaps, confirms that it is justified," Melkumyan said on May 5 in an interview with reporters.
The day before, the Chairman of the Central Bank of Armenia Martin Galstyan, answering the question of whether he considers it realistic to write off debts of more than 2 million borrowers, said: "I think that absolutely should not be done. Earlier we had such an experience - debts of a certain group of people were written off, and then our research showed that 50% of these people were again in the same situation as before the debt was written off, "he said. At the same time, Galstyan added that in this way a specific incentive mechanism is created, which does not have economic logic and runs counter to the concept of justice. "So I think it's unwise," he added.
Meanwhile, Mikael Melkumyan interprets the words of the head of the financial regulator in his own way. Thus, according to the "prosperous" MP, this suggests that such a "zeroing" at one time led to an improvement in the financial condition of 50% of amnestied borrowers, and only the remaining 50%, possibly, were again "in the captivity of the debt burden."
Melkumyan shared "his professional" opinion. The problem is that, according to the lawmaker, in a war, pandemic, when there are no jobs, and people have assumed credit obligations to ensure their normal activities, they cannot be expected to be able to timely fulfill their obligations to creditors, " since they are not to blame for the creation of such conditions. " "Plus, 50% is also a result, and during this event (writing off debts up to 3 million - Ed. note), we will be in completely new economic conditions," he said. In addition, according to him, if you look closely at the dynamics of loan growth, you can see that the number of loans issued over the past 2.5-3 years has grown by 550-600 thousand. "The bulk of loans issued are consumer loans, followed by agricultural loans, student loans, etc. That is, people are not able to live, exist without loans, and the conditions created in the country do not allow them to get out of this situation, "Melkumyan said.
The parliamentarian recalled Tsarukyan's words that the banks of Armenia perform the function of pawnshops and do not leave any chances for development. "If the current monetary policy continues for another year or a year and a half, the number of loans will reach 4-5 million - more than the country's population," he said. Proceeding from this, Mikael Melkumyan urges to listen to Gagik Tsarukyan's proposal - to amnesty debts on loans, and then, after people "breathe fresh air", to think about the competent work of credit policy.
On May 4, during a press conference, the head of the Central Bank Martin Galstyan stated that the banks of Armenia revised and pardoned large amounts of loans to the wounded and killed servicemen during the Artsakh war. The lion's share of the amnestied loans fell on the families of the dead servicemen. In total, referring to the latest data, M. Galstyan said that within the framework of this bill, loan obligations for 2 billion drams have already been forgiven. At the same time, the volume of non-performing loans in the banking system of Armenia at the moment is about 7%. Compared to the end of 2020, this figure increased from 6.6% to 7.1%.
According to independent financial analysts, Prosperous Armenia's proposal is purely an electoral, populist action. This kind of pre-election populism is quite popular in post-Soviet electoral processes. At the same time, they note that, despite the sufficient stability of the banking system of Armenia, its main indicators over the past year have deteriorated somewhat due to the coronavirus crisis. Thus, the NPL of the system has reached 7.1% of assets and may rise up to 10% by the end of the year, which is the maximum level by international standards.
Analysts note that NPL growth was predicted even during the first "credit amnesty" in 2018, which only technically and for a short time "revitalized" banks' balance sheets, creating the basis for their intense intoxication in the future, since the reasons for this process are still relevant and related not only with a decrease in the real incomes of the population, and, as a consequence, a decrease in the volume of consumer lending, but also with a decrease in the level of profitability of the business, lending to which is also stagnating and cannot compensate for losses from retail credit. Thus, the proposal of "PAP" is a rather dangerous undertaking, capable of, if not undermining, then substantially "spoiling" the stability of the Armenian banking system, especially since some of them already have a level of real non-repayment that is significantly higher than the 15% level.
According to the rating agency AmRating, the accelerated growth of toxic loans in 2020 was reflected in the "drawdown" of profits. Thus, the total net profit of the banking system of Armenia, amounting to 60.4 billion drams ($ 115.7 million) in 2020, decreased by 20% per annum (against an increase of 34% in 2019), which was observed against the background of an increase in the volume of overdue loans by 38.4% ( against a paltry 3% decline in 2019).
Moreover, only in the IV quarter the profit dynamics sharply went into an 89.5% decline (from 3.5% growth in the III quarter) with the continuing double-digit growth of overdue loans, which could have been higher if it were not for the regulator's proposal to "freeze" for a year, part of the toxic load, which, nevertheless, did not save profits from subsidence, including for 8 banks that received a significant loss. This situation, according to the rating company, was accompanied by an approaching stagnant growth in the amount of healthy (standard) loans in Q4 to 1.3% (from 3.5% in Q3), with a slowing annual growth to 10.3% (from 13.3 % in 2019). The annual upward trend of this portfolio, presumably, was preserved due to the renegotiation of agreements during the credit holidays (from March 13 to June) and the active participation of banks in the 1st and 2nd anti-crisis state programs. Nevertheless, analysts note that the toxicity of consumer loans is growing at an outstripping pace today.
